Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process

A manuscript submitted is evaluated through Initial Review by Editorial Board. If the article matchs the journal requirements in term of the scope, originality, novelty sufficiency of experimental data and format, at least 2 (two) peer reviewers are assigned to review the manuscript with Double-Blind Process. Three weeks are alocation time given to peer revewer to evaluate the manuscipt. After review process is finished, the assigned editor makes decision for the article. If the article needs revision, the manuscript is  returned to the authors to revise. These processes take a month (maximum time). If the decision is major revision or resubmission, revised manuscript that has been resubmitted by submitter is sent back to the previous peer reviwers for re-evaluation. After that, the editor makes final decision (accepted or rejected). In the each manuscript reviewed, peer reviewers will be rated based on the substantial and technical aspects. Peer reviewer that collaborates with Jurnal Nuraga is the expert in the healthy, entrepreneur, technology, teaching area and issues around it.

Rapid Peer-Review Process

Jurnal Nuraga does not accept requests for the rapid peer-review process at all. All manuscripts submitted to Jurnal Nuraga will be treated the same as described in the peer-review process section.

Publication Frequency

Jurnal Nuraga published in April and October.

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.