Conceptual Understanding in Physics and Astronomy: A Bibliometric Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52434/jpif.v5i2.42613Keywords:
conceptual understanding, physics and astronomy, bibliometric analysisAbstract
This study presents a bibliometric analysis of research related to conceptual understanding in physics and astronomy (CUPA), analyzing publication trends, the most contributors, and emerging research directions from 2006 to 2025. The analysis was conducted on 447 documents using VOSviewer and Biblioshiny, as well as Microsoft Excel and Origin to aid data visualization. The analysis revealed a steady increase in the number of publications over time, particularly from 2017 to 2021, reflecting growing interest in this field. Collaborative efforts, both locally and internationally, are prominent, with a strong foundation in the previous literature. The main topics identified include e-learning, computer-aided instruction, and quantum optics, illustrating the influence of educational technology and advanced scientific research. Although research on CUPA has developed significantly, future studies should explore the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in learning, investigate differences in conceptual understanding across educational systems, and address gaps in research conducted in non-English languages. This study highlights the importance of international collaboration and the need for further research to connect conceptual understanding with critical thinking and problem-solving skills, which are essential in 21st-century education.
References
Abaniel, A. (2021). Enhanced conceptual understanding, 21st century skills and learning attitudes through an open inquiry learning model in physics. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(1), 30–43.
Abrar, M. F., Khan, M. S., Khan, I., Ali, G., & Shah, S. (2023). Digital Information Credibility: Towards a Set of Guidelines for Quality Assessment of Grey Literature in Multivocal Literature Review. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/app13074483
Aksnes, D. W., Langfeldt, L., & Wouters, P. (2019). Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories. SAGE Open, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575
Aminuddin, M., Salman, Z., & Irawati, A. (2024). Multi-Representation Approach in Improving 1-Dimensional Kinematics Conceptual Understanding. Universal Education Journal of Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.63081/uejtl.v1i2.34
Asnaini. (2024). Students Conceptual Understanding of Energy : Classroom Action Research with Contextual Learning. UEJTL: Universal Education Journal of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.63081/uejtl.v1i1.1
Atarah, S. A., Martin, E., Florence Christianah, A., & and Amankwah, A. (2025). Improving the Achievement of Learning Outcomes in Early Undergraduate Physics: A Case Study at a University in Ghana. Africa Education Review, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2025.2451425
Azizah, Z., Taqwa, M. R. A., & Assalam, I. T. (2020). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Peserta Didik Menggunakan Isntrumen Berbantukan Quizizz. Edu Sains Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematika, 8(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.23971/eds.v8i2.1707
Berger, J. M., & Baker, C. M. (2014). Bibliometrics: An Overview. Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 4(3), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.5530/rjps.2014.3.2
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining Twenty-First Century Skills. In Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (Vol. 9789400723, pp. 1–345). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5
Boyarchuk, A. A., & Keldysh, L. V. (1999). From a physics laboratory to the department of general physics and astronomy. Vestnik Rossijkoj Akademii Nauk, 69(6), 483–494.
Dewi, H. R., Mayasari, T., & Handhika, J. (2019). Increasing Creative Thinking Skills And Understanding Of Physics Concepts Through Application Of Stem-Based Inquiry. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 4(1), 25–30.
Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2), 1–148. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119
Ginzburg, V. L. (1999). What problems of physics and astrophysics seem now to be especially important and interesting (thirty years later, already on the verge of XXI century)? Physics-Uspekhi, 42(4), 353. https://doi.org/10.1070/PU1999v042n04ABEH000562
Haghani, M. (2023). What makes an informative and publication-worthy scientometric analysis of literature: A guide for authors, reviewers and editors. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 22(September), 100956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2023.100956
Hartini, T., Liliasari, S., Setiawan, A., & Ramalis, T. R. (2020). Enhancing Conceptual Understanding and Critical-Thinking Skills Pre service of Physics Using Mechanics Multi-Representation (MMR). International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(4), 2994–2998.
Harvey, W. S., Mitchell, V. W., Almeida Jones, A., & Knight, E. (2021). The tensions of defining and developing thought leadership within knowledge-intensive firms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(11), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2020-0431
Hulland, J. (2024). Bibliometric reviews — some guidelines. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 52, 935–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-024-01016-x
Khan, D., Verma, M. K., & Yuvaraj, M. (2024). Cluster analysis and network visualization of journals, authors, keywords, and themes of monkeypox research (1989–2022): an updated bibliometric review. Library Hi Tech, 42(6), 1905–1929. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-12-2022-0559
Kone, A., Sullivan, M., Senturia, K. D., Chrisman, N. J., Ciske, S. J., & Krieger, J. W. (2000). Improving collaboration between researchers and communities. Public Health Reports, 115(2–3), 243–248.
Li, J., Goerlandt, F., & Reniers, G. (2021). An overview of scientometric mapping for the safety science community: Methods, tools, and framework. Safety Science, 134(September 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105093
Luthfiyah, I. (2025). Literature Review Trends and Directions in Online Learning Research in Physics and Astronomy Education : A Bibliometric Analysis. UEJTL: Universal Education Journal of Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.63081/uejtl.v2i1.41
Mutsvangwa, A. (2020). A study of student teachers’ misconceptions on uniform circular motion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1512(1), 12029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1512/1/012029
Mwantimwa, K., & Kassim, M. (2023). Why does researchers’ collaboration matter in research activities? Higher Education Quarterly, 77(4), 741–755. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12431
Nicholus, G., Joseph, N., & and Muwonge, C. M. (2024). Evaluating video-based PBL approach on performance and critical thinking ability among Ugandan form-2 secondary school students. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2346040. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2346040
Ojo, A. T. (2024). Examination of secondary school students’ conceptual understanding, perceptions, and misconceptions about genetics concepts. Pedagogical Research, 9(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14095
Oladinrin, O. T., Arif, M., Rana, M. Q., & Gyoh, L. (2023). Interrelations between construction ethics and innovation: a bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer. Construction Innovation, 23(3), 505–523. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-07-2021-0130
Oya, A., Suharta, I. G. P., Lasmawan, I. W., Parmiti, D. P., Nyoman, I., & Candiasa, I. M. (2024). A Bibliometric Analysis of the Impact of Project-Based Assessment on Conceptual Understanding in STEM Education. Journal of Science Learning, 7(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v7i3.69309
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International Journal of Surgery, 88(March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906
Passas, I. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis: The Main Steps. Encyclopedia, 4(2), 1014–1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4020065
Pham, S. T. H., & Sampson, P. M. (2022). The development of artificial intelligence in education: A review in context. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(5), 1408–1421. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12687
Saha, S. K. (2002). Modern optical astronomy: technology and impact of interferometry. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74(2), 551–600. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.74.551
Sahara, L., Nafarudin, N., Fayanto, S., & Tairjanovna, B. A. (2020). Analysis of Improving Students’ Physics Conceptual Understanding through Discovery Learning Models Supported by Multi-representation: Measurement Topic. Indonesian Review of Physics, 3(2), 57. https://doi.org/10.12928/irip.v3i2.3064
Sajovic, Irena, & Boh Podgornik, Bojana. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of Visualizations in Computer Graphics: A Study. SAGE Open, 12(1), 21582440211071104. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211071105
Schiff, D. (2022). Education for AI, not AI for Education: The Role of Education and Ethics in National AI Policy Strategies. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 527–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00270-2
Selwyn, N. (2022). The future of AI and education: Some cautionary notes. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 620–631. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12532
Şensoy, Ö., & Kocakuşak, M. (2025). Investigation of Secondary School Students’ Conceptual Understanding Levels in Astronomy Subjects According to Grade Levels. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 13(1), 27–41. http://mojes.um.edu.my/index.php/MOJES/article/view/59009
Suriano, R., Plebe, A., Acciai, A., & Fabio, R. A. (2025). Student interaction with ChatGPT can promote complex critical thinking skills. Learning and Instruction, 95(April 2024), 102011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102011
Tania, R., Jumadi, & Astuti, D. P. (2020). The application of physics e-handout assisted by PBL model use Edmodo to improve critical thinking skills and ICT literacy of high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012037
Taqwa, M. R. A., & Faizah, R. (2016). Perlunya Program Resitasi dalam Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep Dinamika Partikel Mahasiswa. Seminar Nasional Pembelajaran Ipa Ke-1, May, 482–487. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Muhammad-Taqwa-3/publication/325357660_Perlunya_Program_Resitasi_dalam_Meningkatkan_Penguasaan_Konsep_Dinamika_Partikel_Mahasiswa/links/5b0763a3aca2725783e24d4a/Perlunya-Program-Resitasi-dalam-Meningkatkan-Penguasaan-K
Taqwa, M. R. A., & Rivaldo, L. (2019). Pembelajaran Problem Solving Terintegrasi PhET: Membangun Pemahaman Konsep Listrik Dinamis. Kwangsan: Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 07(01), 45–56. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31800/jtp.kw.v7n1.p45--56
Taqwa, M. R. A., Yusof, M. M. M., Pebriana, I. N., & Misbakhussuduri, A. (2022). Computer-assisted recitation program: A focused study on students’ conceptual understanding on force and motion. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v7i1.6844
Taqwa, M. R. A., Zainuddin, A., & Riantoni, C. (2020). Multi representation approach to increase the students’ conceptual understanding of work and energy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/3/032090
Wahyuni, I. H., & Taqwa, M. R. A. (2022). Level of Students Conceptual Understanding and Resource Theory View: Geometric Optics. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 1(2), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v1i2.38
Wandi, W., Mardianti, F., Suwarma, I. R., & Liliawati, W. (2023). Theory and Practice of Conceptual Understanding in Physics Education: A Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis of the Recent Decades. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal (KPEJ), 6(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v6i2.483
Yates, L., & and Millar, V. (2016). ‘Powerful knowledge’ curriculum theories and the case of physics. The Curriculum Journal, 27(3), 298–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2016.1174141
Zafar, L., Masood, N., Hadi, F., & Ahmed, S. (2024). Analyzing Paper Citation Trend of Popular Research Fields. Journal of Computing & Biomedical Informatics, 06(02). https://doi.org/10.56979/602/2024
Zamani, M. Z., & Suyudi, A. (2024). Analysis of Student Learning Difficulties in Blended Learning in Classical Mechanics Course. UEJTL: Universal Education Journal of Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 30–34. https://doi.org/10.63081/uejtl.v1i2.32
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Reyza Arief Taqwa, Endi Suhendi, Handy Faishal Rahim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
