The Application of Machine Learning Algorithms in Analyzing Students' Conceptual Error Patterns in Science Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52434/jpif.v5i1.42586Keywords:
machine learning algorithms, misconception analysis, science education, educational technology, interactive visualizationAbstract
Science education often faces challenges related to conceptual errors made by students, which can hinder their understanding of the material being taught. This study aims to identify and analyze common conceptual errors through the application of machine learning algorithms. The method employed in this research is a literature review approach, where various relevant studies are analyzed to understand the application of machine learning in the context of science education. The findings of the study indicate that several machine learning algorithms, such as large language models and interactive visualization techniques, can be utilized to detect misconceptions in students with higher accuracy and provide more personalized feedback. Although there are some challenges related to the accuracy and reliability of the systems used, the application of these techniques shows significant potential in enhancing the effectiveness of science education. Overall, the application of machine learning in science education can make a substantial contribution to helping teachers analyze and correct the conceptual errors made by students, ultimately improving the quality of the learning process. The implications of this research suggest the need for further development to create technology-based education systems that can better respond to students' learning needs.
References
Ady, W. N., Muhajir, S. N., & Irvani, A. I. (2024). Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA melalui Model Problem Based Learning Berbantuan Permainan Tradisional. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MIPA, 14(3), 772–785. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v14i3.1775
Alfiansyah, A. F., Septianti, R. P., Qolbi, W. N., & Irvani, A. I. (2022). Berkembangnya Pemanfaatan E-Learning pada Proses Pembelajaran Fisika di MAN 1 Garut Selama Masa Pandemi. JURNAL Pendidikan dan Ilmu Fisika, 2(2), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.52434/JPIF.V2I2.1880
Chew, S. L., & Cerbin, W. J. (2021). The cognitive challenges of effective teaching. The Journal of Economic Education, 52(1), 17–40.
Christiani, M., Munzil, M., & Yulianti, E. (2021). Identifikasi miskonsepsi materi getaran dan gelombang pada siswa SMP kelas VIII menggunakan three-tier test. Jurnal MIPA dan Pembelajarannya (JMIPAP), 1(4), 304–321.
Elsayed, H. (2024). The Impact of Hallucinated Information in Large Language Models on Student Learning Outcomes: A Critical Examination of Misinformation Risks in AI-Assisted Education. Northern Reviews on Algorithmic Research, Theoretical Computation, and Complexity, 9(8), 11–23.
Gm, D., Goudar, R. H., Kulkarni, A. A., Rathod, V. N., & Hukkeri, G. S. (2024). A digital recommendation system for personalized learning to enhance online education: A review. IEEE Access, 12, 34019–34041.
Hall, E., Seyam, M., & Dunlap, D. (2024). Exploring Explainability and Transparency in Automated Essay Scoring Systems: A User-Centered Evaluation. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 266–282.
Heidari, A., & Jabraeil Jamali, M. A. (2023). Internet of Things intrusion detection systems: a comprehensive review and future directions. Cluster Computing, 26(6), 3753–3780.
Henukh, A., Riandi, R., Setiawan, A., Rochintaniawati, D., Irvani, A. I., & Suba, J. M. (2024). Dynamic Evaluation of the Merdeka Curriculum: Unveiling the Effectiveness of Science Lesson Planning, Implementation and the Response of Junior High School Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 12(3), 683–692. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v12i3.38540
Hernandi, A., Warliani, R., & Irvani, A. I. (2024). Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Fisika dengan Model Talking Stick. JPF (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika) Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, 12(2), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.24252/jpf.v12i2.50769
Hilbert, S., Coors, S., Kraus, E., Bischl, B., Lindl, A., Frei, M., Wild, J., Krauss, S., Goretzko, D., & Stachl, C. (2021). Machine learning for the educational sciences. Review of Education, 9(3), e3310.
Hooda, M., Rana, C., Dahiya, O., Rizwan, A., & Hossain, M. S. (2022). Artificial intelligence for assessment and feedback to enhance student success in higher education. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022(1), 5215722.
Irvani, A. I. (2022). Merancang Media Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Bagaimana Siswa Belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Sains, 5(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.52188/jpfs.v5i1.205
Irvani, A. I., Warliani, R., & Amarulloh, R. R. (2020). Pelatihan Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi Sebagai Media Pembelajaran. Jurnal PkM MIFTEK, 1(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.33364/MIFTEK/V.1-1.35
Irvani, A. I., Warliani, R., & Fauziyyah, S. A. (2020). Analysis of Students Problem Solving Skill from Online Worksheets with Integration of Video Demonstration. Proceeding ISETH (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity), 140–144. https://proceedings.ums.ac.id/iseth/article/view/1282
Kieser, F., Wulff, P., Kuhn, J., & Küchemann, S. (2023). Educational data augmentation in physics education research using ChatGPT. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2), 20150.
Kwon, K., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Brush, T. A., Jeon, M., & Yan, G. (2021). Integration of problem-based learning in elementary computer science education: effects on computational thinking and attitudes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 2761–2787.
Liu, Q., Pinto, J. D., & Paquette, L. (2024). Applications of explainable ai (xai) in education. In Trust and Inclusion in AI-Mediated Education: Where Human Learning Meets Learning Machines (hal. 93–109). Springer.
Luan, H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2021). A review of using machine learning approaches for precision education. Educational Technology & Society, 24(1), 250–266.
Lundberg, S. M., Erion, G., Chen, H., DeGrave, A., Prutkin, J. M., Nair, B., Katz, R., Himmelfarb, J., Bansal, N., & Lee, S.-I. (2020). From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nature machine intelligence, 2(1), 56–67.
Maier, U., & Klotz, C. (2022). Personalized feedback in digital learning environments: Classification framework and literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100080.
Manfreda Kolar, V., & Hodnik, T. (2021). Mathematical literacy from the perspective of solving contextual problems. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 467–483.
Mason, L., & Zaccoletti, S. (2021). Inhibition and conceptual learning in science: A review of studies. Educational Psychology Review, 33(1), 181–212.
Muhajir, S. N., Irvani, A. I., Mulvia, R., Fitriyani, F., & Lestari, R. T. (2025). The implementation of PeSACCS (Peer and Self-Assessment for Collaboration and Communication Skills) in experimental class. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 10(1), 33–44.
Ramdani, A., Jufri, A. W., Gunawan, G., Fahrurrozi, M., & Yustiqvar, M. (2021). Analysis of students’ critical thinking skills in terms of gender using science teaching materials based on the 5E learning cycle integrated with local wisdom. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(2), 187–199.
Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature machine intelligence, 1(5), 206–215.
Sánchez‐Peña, M., Vieira, C., & Magana, A. J. (2023). Data science knowledge integration: Affordances of a computational cognitive apprenticeship on student conceptual understanding. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 31(2), 239–259.
Schwartz, R., Schwartz, R., Vassilev, A., Greene, K., Perine, L., Burt, A., & Hall, P. (2022). Towards a standard for identifying and managing bias in artificial intelligence (Vol. 3). US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology ….
Shao, Z., Yuan, S., Gao, L., He, Y., Yang, D., & Chen, S. (2025). Unlocking Scientific Concepts: How Effective Are LLM-Generated Analogies for Student Understanding and Classroom Practice? Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–19.
Smart, F., Bos, N. D., & Bos, J. T. (2024). Can Large Language Models Recognize and Respond to Student Misconceptions? International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 288–299.
Touretzky, D., Gardner-McCune, C., & Seehorn, D. (2023). Machine learning and the five big ideas in AI. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33(2), 233–266.
Ulfa, S., Irvani, A. I., & Warliani, R. (2024). Pengembangan Modul Ajar Fisika Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Sains (JPFS), 7(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.52188/jpfs.v7i1.562
Veale, M., Van Kleek, M., & Binns, R. (2018). Fairness and accountability design needs for algorithmic support in high-stakes public sector decision-making. Proceedings of the 2018 chi conference on human factors in computing systems, 1–14.
Wang, W., Rao, Y., Shi, Y., Milliken, A., Martens, C., Barnes, T., & Price, T. W. (2020). Comparing Feature Engineering Approaches to Predict Complex Programming Behaviors. CSEDM@ EDM.
Wu, M., Mosse, M., Goodman, N., & Piech, C. (2019). Zero shot learning for code education: Rubric sampling with deep learning inference. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33(01), 782–790.
Yazdinejad, A., Dehghantanha, A., Parizi, R. M., Srivastava, G., & Karimipour, H. (2023). Secure intelligent fuzzy blockchain framework: Effective threat detection in iot networks. Computers in Industry, 144, 103801.
Zhai, X., He, P., & Krajcik, J. (2022). Applying machine learning to automatically assess scientific models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(10), 1765–1794.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohammad Santosa Mulyo Diningrat, Faizatul Mabruroh, Herma Widya, Nurhamidah Nurhamidah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
