Kebijakan Editorial

Kebijakan Bagian

Artikel

Naskah Terbuka

Diindeks

Telah di-Peer review

Proses Peer Review

Peer-Review Process

A manuscript submitted is evaluated through Initial Review by Editorial Board. If the article match the journal requirements in term of the scope, originality, novelty sufficiency of experimental data and format, at least 2 (two) peer reviewers are assigned to review the manuscript with Blind Review Process. Three weeks are alocation time given to peer reviewer to evaluate the manuscript. After review process is finished, the assigned editor makes decision for the article. If the article needs revision, the manuscript is returned to the authors to revise. These processes take a month (maximum time). If the decision is major revision or resubmission, revised manuscript that has been resubmitted by submitter is sent back to the previous peer reviewers for re-evaluation. After that, the editor makes final decision (accepted or rejected). In the each manuscript reviewed, peer reviewers will be rated based on the substantial and technical aspects. Assigment of peer reviewer is based on the expertise and experiences in research and publication relevant to the field of manuscript to be reviewed. Number of citation and h-index value of peer reviewers are parameter examples for consideration in assigning as reviewer.

Rapid Peer-Review Process

NURAGA: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat does not accept requests for the rapid peer-review process at all. All manuscripts submitted to NURAGA will be treated the same as described in the peer-review process section.

Kebijakan Akses Terbuka

Jurnal ini menyediakan akses terbuka yang pada prinsipnya membuat riset tersedia secara gratis untuk publik dan akan mensupport pertukaran pengetahuan global terbesar.