A Survey of Reading Requirements in Physics Education Journals for Undergraduate Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52434/jpif.v5i2.43280Abstract
This study investigates the reading needs and difficulties of Indonesian undergraduate Physics Education students when engaging with English-language physics education journals. Using a descriptive quantitative survey design, data were collected from 52 students through a semi-standardized 40-item Likert questionnaire (1–5) covering eight dimensions: reading purposes, awareness of journal structure, vocabulary and technical terms, comprehension skills, reading strategies, reading difficulties, attitudes and motivation, and institutional support. Content validity was confirmed through expert judgment, and internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.956). Descriptive analysis in Google Sheets showed that students strongly value journal reading for coursework, thesis writing, and professional preparation, and they demonstrate basic familiarity with IMRAD conventions. However, they still experience major barriers in understanding discipline-specific and methodological vocabulary, interpreting multimodal data such as tables, graphs, and diagrams, and navigating Result sections when journal layouts vary. Strategy use also remains limited, as students tend to read linearly and rely on translation tools rather than using abstract-first reading, skimming, or scanning consistently. Although motivation toward journal reading is positive, low confidence in reading without translation indicates that skills development has not matched their academic awareness. The study highlights the need for integrated journal-reading support in Physics Education programs, especially systematic vocabulary enrichment, guided multimodal-reading practice, and flexible strategy training, supported by stronger institutional access to international journals.
References
Anthony , L. (2018). Introducing English for Specific Purposes. New York: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
Crawford Camiciottoli, B., & Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2022). Towards developing multimodal literacies in the ESP classroom: Methodological insights and practical applications Introduction to the SPECIAL ISSUE Multimodal approaches in ESP: Innovative research and practice. Multimodal Communication, 11(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2021-0021
Di Brico, K., & Zakonova, K. (2025). Bridging the gap: adapting IMRaD to meet student needs. Young Scholars in Writing, 22, 32–51. https://youngscholarsinwriting.org/index.php/ysiw/article/view/408
Grabe , W., & Stoller, F. (2019). Teaching and Researching Reading (3rd ed.). London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
Green, C., & Lambert, J. (2018). Advancing disciplinary literacy through English for academic purposes: Discipline-specific wordlists, collocations and word families for eight secondary subjects. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 35, 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.07.004
Handayani, W., Setiawan, W., Sinaga, P., & Suhandi, A. (2018). Students’ reading comprehension skills of science and physics texts. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 4(2), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v4i2.21633
Jeppsson, F., Danielsson, K., Nestlog, E. B., & Tang, K. S. (2022). Primary Pupils’ Multimodal Representations in Worksheets—Text Work in Science Education. Education Sciences, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030221
John M, S. (2016). Reflections on Genre in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Kararo, M., & McCartney, M. (2019). Annotated primary scientific literature: A pedagogical tool for undergraduate courses. PLoS Biology, 17(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000103
Lammers, Goedhart, J. R., & Lucy, A. (2019). Scientific Reading Strategies in Higher Education. Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Listiani, I., Susilo, H., & Sueb, S. (2022). Relationship between Scientific Literacy and Critical Thinking of Prospective Teachers. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(1), 721–730. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.1355
Macaro, E., & Aizawa, I. (2024). English medium instruction, EAP/ESP: Exploring overlap and divergences in research aims. International Journal of Applied Linguistics (United Kingdom), 34(4), 1352–1367. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12563
Macdiarmid, C., & Szilagyi, M. (2024). Meeting student needs : EAP course design for education students In this presentation … • Our context : EGAP & ESAP courses. October. https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/342100/
Nabilla, S., Kurniawan, E., & Gunawan, W. (2024). Rhetorical move structure of soft and hard science research article introductions by novice Indonesian authors. Bahasa Dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Dan Pengajarannya, 49(2). https://doi.org/10.17977/um015v49i22021p135
Qian, Q., Zheng, G., Huang, X., & Liao, X. (2023). Relationship Between Student-Perceived Reading Strategy Instruction and Students’ Reading Comprehension: A Serial Multiple Mediation Model. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 39(6), 582–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2023.2165464
Stefanova, A., & Bozeva, D. (2023). Needs Analysis in ESP as a Motivator and Means to Optimise Academic ESP Courses. English Studies at NBU, 9(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.33919/esnbu.23.1.2
Webb, S., & Nation , P. (2017). How Vocabulary Grows in Disciplinary Reading. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Wulff, P. (2024). Physics language and language use in physics—What do we know and how AI might enhance language-related research and instruction. European Journal of Physics, 45(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ad0f9c
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marsa Khoerunnisa, Nina Widiya Nengsih, Wahyunengsih

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.






















