Rasch Model: Identifikasi Kemampuan Habits Of Mind Peserta Didik SMA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52434/jpif.v1i1.1258Keywords:
habits of mind, Peserta Didik SMA, Rasch ModelAbstract
Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengidentifikasi kemampuan habits of mind yang dimiliki peserta didik SMA dengan analisis Rasch Model. Habits of mind adalah kemampuan perilaku cerdas paling tinggi yang dimiliki peserta didik sebagai hasil belajar jangka panjang pada proses pembelajaran sehingga dijadikan indikator kesuksesan dalam penyelesaian masalah. Habits of mind terbagi menjadi tiga kategori: berpikir kritis, berpikir kreatif dan regulasi diri. Untuk mencapai tujuan, Rasch Model digunakan untuk menganalisis kemampuan habits of mind peserta didik SMA. Hal ini dikarenakan, Â Rasch Model memiliki asumsi invariansi parameter artinya parameter butir soal tidak bergantung pada parameter kemampuan peserta didik dan parameter kemampuan peserta didik tidak bergantung pada parameter butir soal. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kuantitatif dengan partisipan 36 peserta didik SMA yang berumur 16-17 tahun dan dipilih secara random sampling. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah kuesioner yang terdiri dari 15 pernyataan mencakup setiap kategori habits of mind dan dinyatakan layak oleh ahli. Hasilnya, kemampuan habits of mind yang dimiliki peserta didik SMA berbeda untuk setiap kategori. Sebagian besar dari partisipan memiliki habits of mind-berpikir kritis dan habits of mind-berpikir kreatif di atas rata-rata dibandingkan habits of mind-regulasi diri. Oleh karena itu, untuk meningkatkan habits of mind dapat melalui pembelajaran dengan strategi asesmen formatif yaitu feedback, self-assessment dan peer-assessment.References
Bee, M. S. H., Seng, H. G., & Jusoff K. (2013). Habits of Mind in the ESL Classroom. English Language Teaching DOI:10.5539/elt.v6n11p130
Black, P and Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 5(1) DOI: 10.1080/0969595980050102
Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (2003). Calibrationof an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: anapplication of item response theory to the Headache Impact Test (HITâ„¢). Qual. Life Res. 12 DOI: 10.1023/A:1026163113446
Bolt, D. M., Hare, R. D., Vitale, J. E., & Newman, J. P. (2004). A multigroup item response theory analysis of the psychopathy checklist–revised. Psychol. Assess. 16 DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.16.2.155
Campbell, J. (2006). Theorising Habits of mind as a Framework for Learning. Central Queensland University.
Costa, A. L. (1991). Teaching and Assessing Habits of mind. National Institute of Education Library, Singapore.
Costa A. L., & Kallick, B. (1998). Habits of Mind in the Curriculum. Education for Meaning and Social Justice
Costa, A. L. & Bena, K. (2000). Describing 16 Habits of mind. A Developmental Series. Alexandria VA. Diakses dari: HYPERLINK "http://www.ccsnh.edu/documents/CCSNHMLC.HabitsofMindCostaKallick" www.ccsnh.edu/documents/CCSNHMLC.HabitsofMindCostaKallick .
DeMars, C. (2010). Item response theory. Series in Understanding Statistics. Oxford University Press, Inc. Madison Avenue, New York
Dikli, S. (2003). Assessment at a distance: Traditional vs. Alternative Assessments. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET) ISSN: 1303-6521
Gloria, R. Y., et al. (2017). Formative Assessment with Stages of Understanding by Design (UbD) in Improving Habits of Mind. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education 2233-2242
Griffin, P dkk. (2012). Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Spinger.
Hamayan, E. V. (1995) Approaches to Alternative Assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics DOI 10.1017/S0267190500002695
Hayat, M. S et al. (2018). Profile of Life-long Learning of Prospective Teacher in Learning Biology. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1157 (2019) 022083 DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022083
Hizqiyah, I. Y. N., et al. (2018). Developing Habits of Mind through Web Based Learning Approach. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. 3rd Asian Education Symposium (AES 2018)
Hofstein, A., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2007). The Laboratory in Science Education: The State of The Art. Chemistry Education Research and Practice.
Hwang, G. Hung, C & Chen, N. (2014). Improving Learning Achievements, Motivations and Problem-Solving Skills Through a Peer Assessment-based Game Development Approach. Education Tech Research Development 62 DOI 10.1007/s11423-013-9320-7
Jiang S, Wang C & Welss D J. (2016). Sample Size Requirements for Estimation of Item Parameneters in the Multidimensional Graded Response Model. Front. Psychol DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00109
Kohli, N., dkk. (2014). Relationships among classical test theory and item response theory frameworks via factor analytic models. Journal Educational and Psychological Measurement
Kuo, T. & Sheng, Y. (2016). A Comparison of Estimation Methodes for a Multi-unidimensional Graded Response IRT Model. Front. Psychol. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00880
Marzano, R.J. (1992). A Different Kind of Classroom : Teaching with Dimensions of Learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, Va.
Marzano, R. J. et. al. (1993). Assessing Student Outcomes : Performance Assessment Using the Dimentions of Learning Model. Mid-Continent Regional Educational Lab., Aurora, CO.
Marzano, R. J et. al. (1997). Dimension of Learning Trainer’s Manual,2nd Ed, Aurora, Colorado: McREL.
Nahadi, Firman, H., & Farina, J. (2015). Effect of Feedback in Formative Assessment in the Students Learning Activities on Chemical Course to the Formation of Habits of Mind. Indonesian Journal of Science Education DOI: 10.15294/jpii.v4i1.3499
Neo, C.E., & Cheung, W.S. (2005). The impact of directed viewing-thinking activity on students’ critical thinking: Part II. New Horizons in Education. 52.
Panadero, E & Romero, M. (2014). To Rubric or Not To Rubric? The Effects of Self-Assessment on Self-Regulation, Performance and Self-Efficacy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 21 (2) DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2013.877872
Qasem, M. A. N. (2013). A Comparative Study of Classical Theory (Ct) and Item Response Theory (IRT) In Relation To Various Approaches of Evaluating the Validity and Reliabilitsy of Research Tools. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 3 (5).
Retnawati, H. (2014). Teori Respons Butir dan Penerapannya. Yogyakarta: PT. Parama Publishing.
Shavelson, R. J, Zlatkon-Troitschanskaian O & Marino J. P. (2018). International Performance Assessment of Learning in Higher Education (iPAL) : Research and Development. Assessment of Learning Outcomes in Higher Education, Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-74338-7_10
Sadler D. R. (1989). Formative Assessment and The Design of Instrutional Systems. Instructional Science 18
Sumintono, S & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch pada Assessment Pendidikan. Cimahi : Penerbit Trim Komunikata
Susilowati, E et al. (2018). Profile Habits of Mind Students in Physics Learning. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1120 (2018) 012055 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1120/1/012055
Volkmann, M. J & Eichinger, D. C. (1999). Habits of Mind: Integrating the Social and Personal Characteristics of Doing Science Into the Science Classroom. School Science and Mathematics.
